Originally Posted by
King of the Americas
Should I claim that skeptics have 'ran' from this topic because they refused to address the research provided?
Perhaps you could sum up the claim as you understand it, as well as the evidence that you think supports it?
Alternately since you think Shermer did such a bad job in the podcast, perhaps you could quote some of things that he said that you think aren't true? We could analyse his contribution based on any errors you think he made.
I'd be happy with either approach.