View Single Post
Old 15th July 2014, 12:18 PM   #31
ergo's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,339
Originally Posted by Miragememories View Post
When donations were few it was called "lack of support".

When donations reflect strong support, you fail to acknowledge it for the endorsement it represents and instead accuse organizers of scamming the unsuspecting.
Absolutely right. 9/11 bedunkers are obsessed with truther fundraising.

Few/slow donations = "pathetic", "lack of support", "fringe cause"

Increased/fast donations = "gullible truthers", "Dicky Gage's vacation fund", "SCAM!!1!"

That's the level of "analysis" we find here.
“Much of the 9/11 story has not been told to the public" - Steven Badger, attorney for insurance litigators affected by the WTC disaster.
ergo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top