Originally Posted by
Criteria
Well Tony, you know the "regulars" have no control over their canned behaviour.
As you well know, their pathetic game is to provoke you into violating the MA, with the gold medal going to the most successful provocateur.
I for one, applaud both you, and this study, which is well worth supporting.
WTC 7 has always been the "smoking gun" of 9/11 and if this project can answer the many questions that the NIST failed refused to answer, it will be well worth the money spent.
Anyone with a true interest in what caused the collapse of WTC 7 should support this study.
If you stick around, could you explain how a paint-thin layer of thermitic material could damage WTC structural steel?