View Single Post
Old 26th November 2015, 02:14 PM   #213
JSanderO
Illuminator
 
JSanderO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 3,232
Originally Posted by DGM View Post
It certainly has no value in a study of a building collapse. Neither does his statement that the building was not hit by an aircraft. Why would he even bring up this irrelevant detail?

I hope his students keep him focused because it appears he needs it.
The not hit by an aircraft is supposed the undercut the CD explanation of the twin towers.... fire alone can't destroy the integrity of a structure... see it took a commercial airliner to start the twin tower collapses.

He doesn't sound like a critical thinker. Oh dear!
JSanderO is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top