Originally Posted by
Tony Szamboti
I did not come to a conclusion before looking into the matter. I heard different things and decided to look into it. What I found was that there is plenty of evidence of involvement in the collapses of the three buildings by more terrorists than those on the aircraft. It sounds like you just want to hide your head in the sand and say there isn't.
But then, when it's pretty clearly shown that your conclusions don't hold, not only do you cling to them without adequate defense, you imply that the people who have exposed the flaws must be part of the conspiracy. If you say you are trying to be rational, I'll believe you, but...