View Single Post
Old 28th November 2015, 05:16 AM   #229
Spanx
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,046
Originally Posted by Tony Szamboti View Post
I am not covering for the terrorists on the planes. I am saying there is evidence of additional terrorists being involved in the three NYC building collapses on Sept. 11, 2001. Do you understand the use of the word additional means it includes those on the planes?

I have serious concerns about the motivations of those on this forum who insist that there is no evidence of involvement of additional terrorists and that no additional investigation is necessary.
Ok, let's start by you telling me who these additional terrorists are ?

Now present the evidence you claim to have and why the terrorists on the plane would need to fly jets into the building when they had already rigged the three buildings with explosives ?

I agree, you have serious concerns about anyone who doesn't agree with you. You even go to extent of jumping to the conclusion that I/we are the additional terrorists.

Paranoid delusions springs to mind
Spanx is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top