Originally Posted by
DGM
The judges are not going to even listen to any of this. The only thing they will hear is evidence being called a "crackpot" hurt his reputation. To win this, he has to show his reputation was hurt by this comment and this comment alone.
We had something very similar here, with a trial about the harm to the reputation of a guy called Pedro Amorós caused by an article written by a reporter, related to the "faces of Bélmez". The trial focused on the authenticity of the faces, rather than on the harm to Amorós' reputation.
He lost, of course. The trial was a joke.