Originally Posted by
RecoveringYuppy
Which evidence is new? Bullet point descriptions would be fine.
1) It did not originate in the sea food wet market
2) The concern over the highly unlikely coincidence it began in Wuhan now that we know more about the genome and potential animal sources.
3) The species transfer of SARS to people occurred after the palm civet cats and bats were commonly sold in wet markets together in southern China.
If we accept pangolins as the intermediary source, (maybe they initially traded virus back and forth between bats), one still has to explain why the outbreak would occur in Wuhan where the lab is.