View Single Post
Old 16th August 2015, 04:17 PM   #3
Axxman300
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central California Coast
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Well of course. The top experts on the mob and its relationship to the JFK assassination, just formed their conclusions on a Ouiji board.
Probably the most reliable of sources for this CT subject.

Quote:
Never mind the many hundreds of sourced footnotes in their books, or the minor fact that Marcello swore that he would kill JFK and then confessed to doing so, to an FBI informant, mafia attorney Frank Ragano, and others.
Swearing he was going to kill someone and actually doing so are entirely different things.


Quote:
Never mind the fact that Sam Giancana was murdered exactly 5 days before he was supposed to testify about the mob's connections to the CIA,
Giancana was murdered because he was going to talk - period. They didn't know what he was going to say and they weren't going to take the chance. At that time his mind was going, so he was a risk. There was a long list of KNOWN reasons to shut him up.



Quote:
or that Johnny Roselli's dismembered body was found floating in an oil drum, shortly after telling the Washington Post that the mob ordered Ruby to kill Oswald.
He'd already tesitfied before the Church Commission and the HSCA. He had his chance to come clean and he didn't. He reveal much about the CIA and Mafia connections too.


Quote:
Gosh, how could anyone be suspicious about those little details
Not one changes the fact that Oswald was the lone shooter in Dallas that day.

Quote:
And finally, the HSCA confirmed that shots fired from Oswald's rifle, where much louder than motorcycle backfires.]
The HSCA was not conclusive, presented no solid evidence, and is hardly the last word on the subject.

Quote:
2. The large consensus of witnesses was that they heard two closely bunched gunshots at the end of the attack. That is a perfect match with shots at 285 and 313, 1.5 seconds apart.
Again, you're ignoring the massive echo in the plaza that makes your sound theory worthless. You are arguing sound using silent film, and testimony of terrified people in the target vehicle.

This is foolish.

You have no objective data point to anchor your case.

Just because some guy says the MC was a certain Db doesn't tell us how sound traveled in Dealey Plaza, and does not tell us how sound traveled on that day. What does the the MC sound like 6 floors up? How does the shock wave move through the air conditions of that day?

Then you throw the word "Involuntary" around as if it is universal, and it is not. You assume everyone would react to a loud noise the same and this claim has NEVER been true.

Last edited by Locknar; 17th August 2015 at 04:03 AM. Reason: Fixed QUOTE
Axxman300 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top