Originally Posted by
Robert Harris
One of my arguments is that there are no plausible alternatives. Do you dispute that?
It has been disputed, right here in this thread. I've pointed out, repeatedly, that many of the witnesses' recollections you cite are fully consistent with only two shots being fired, with the impact on the head being heard as an additional third shot.
Indeed, two of the closest witnesses, SS Agent Clint Hill and Governor John Connally, said precisely that, differentiating between the sound of the gunshot and the sound of the impact on the head, saying they heard both.
All this was covered previously. You ignore it by claiming above there are no possible alternatives.
Let me cite some of those arguments now. For example:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=3287
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=3432
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=3273
I've also pointed out that Kellerman's recollection of the time span of the shots - five seconds from first to last - is fully consistent with the 4.9 seconds between shots at Z223 and Z313 - again, fully consistent with a two-shot scenario. See here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=3430
etc. etc.
You ignore that too, in claiming there are no possible alternatives. There are, and it has been pointed out repeatedly.
Hank