View Single Post
Old 26th June 2018, 12:06 PM   #55
xjx388
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7,496
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
The argument the docs are committing some kind of professional malpractice continues ad nauseum. It's been addressed. The rebuttal arguments are not responsive, instead the assertion of misunderstood practice norms is simply repeated.
They ARE committing a breach of ethics. That much is clear. You can't even disagree with that. You can only try to justify the breach. The APA has rebutted those justifications adequately and you really have no response.

The other thing that is clear is that they are NOT practicing medicine in any sense of the word. They don't have a patient and they aren't applying accepted standards. You can only argue about "misunderstood practice norms." Yet, you can't actually illustrate whatever practice norms might apply or where that misunderstanding actually lies. That's because there are no practice norms that apply to "remote diagnosis;" therefore, there is nothing to misunderstand. You are free to rebut this with some valid and reliable method of "remote diagnosis."

What you are left with is an argument from authority, both the practitioners in the OP and your own. As if the mere fact of being a psychologist, psychiatrist or other medical professional grants a magic power to know things without actually applying the standards of the profession.

With this extremely weak sauce, you are attempting to pass off a steaming pile of pseudoscientific crap as a gourmet meal. No thanks, I'm full.
__________________
Hello.

Last edited by xjx388; 26th June 2018 at 01:02 PM.
xjx388 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top