View Single Post
Old 10th December 2018, 04:03 PM   #365
Itchy Boy
Muse
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: CANADA
Posts: 964
Originally Posted by Horatius View Post
You do realize that "mere precedent" is literally the underpinnings of all of common law, right?

No, of course you don't.



This is like the Anti-Freeman on the Land theory. Instead of the common law being all-powerful, it apparently has no power at all.



Now, aside from all this, what is the point of your obsession with this aspect of Canadian constitution law? What do you expect us to do, if you manage to convince us that Liz really is secretly running everything?
Does the supreme law of the land (Constitution) fall under common law?
__________________
It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled. - unattributed

Only the small secrets need to be protected. The large ones are kept secret by public incredulity. - Marshall McLuhan
Itchy Boy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top