Originally Posted by
fromdownunder
Which applies in Canada if wanted.
Don't you get that the Queen rules at the consent of the ruled and has no real power? Rulers by right of birth in the past have discovered that when they try something, they are out or in some cases dead. That is the practicality of the situation that you refuse to acknowledge despite dozens of examples dotting the many pages of this thread.
Norm
Nope, he isn't interested in anything but the wording of the Canadian constitution. He has no idea what it really means or how it got there. He's done zero research so far and does not intend to do any now or in future. It' an exercise solely in "LOOK AT THESE WORDS THEY ARE ENABLING THE BILDERBERGS THE QUEEN IS DARTH VADER AND A MEMBER OF THE STAR CHAMBER ERMAGERD THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING WRONG IN MY LIFE GOTTA GET MA GUNZZZ!"
Or something like that. Committed to deliberate ignorance.