Originally Posted by
Leumas
What do you find contradictory in what he wrote?
The "might"s in that post are related to the specific ways that the hardware and software of intelligence may have to be designed, not general point (which he said is not conjecture) that it could be done by a turing machine.
He basically said: we don't know specifically how it will be implemented, but however it is implemented it will be a turing machine. What's contradictory there?
(and if you respond, could you avoid yelling? I have sensitive ears)