Originally Posted by
ozeco41
I understand now where you are coming from. IMO the more important issue is not the accusation of explicit lie - rather Tony's avoidance of the main thrust of Gamolon's question which was:
Originally Posted by Gamolon
How come freefall acceleration did not start immediately upon this supposed simultaneous/synchronized/8 floor demolition? Chandler's graph shows a short period of non-freefall right before the actual freefall.
That - IMO - is the key question which Tony avoided.
Tony did not avoid that question - he denied its premise, contrary to fact, by pointing very specifically to a detail of the data in question - and misrepresenting it. It is difficult to see how he could not be very much aware of the fact that Chandler had almost a second of non-freefall after all these years. I conclude a very deliberate and malevolent act of conscious misrepresentation, a.k.a. "
lie".