View Single Post
Old 3rd December 2015, 03:09 AM   #333
Master Poster
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,045
Originally Posted by ozeco41 View Post

That - IMO - is the key question which Tony avoided.

You need to remember that in Tony and AE911truths world they start with the conclusion that explosives were present. The evidence of explosives should be the starting point which of course is the part being avoided.

The mechanism of the collapse is pointless until you have found the cause, fire doesn't even enter into it when it is the most clearly visible aspect to look into.
Spanx is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top