Originally Posted by
ozeco41
That - IMO - is the key question which Tony avoided.
.
You need to remember that in Tony and AE911truths world they start with the conclusion that explosives were present. The evidence of explosives should be the starting point which of course is the part being avoided.
The mechanism of the collapse is pointless until you have found the cause, fire doesn't even enter into it when it is the most clearly visible aspect to look into.