Originally Posted by
Criteria
And what possible significance can you place on extremely minor measurement variations recorded for that non-laboratory timed event, which had a total span of only a few seconds?
Originally Posted by
Dave Rogers
Ask Tony. He's the one claiming that the absence of these minor variations is evidence of explosives, despite the fact that he can see them right under his nose.
As usual, he's pretending evidence isn't there because he thinks it weakens his case if he admits it exists.
Dave
I’ve looked through this thread and have not found any post by Mr. Szamboti that matches your spin.
What I see are plot variations which are
so minor, that they are not worthy of consideration.
There are certainly no time deviations dramatic enough to suggest that WTC7 was meeting enough resistance to argue against freefall.
Originally Posted by
Dave Rogers
”..And, to be fair, the fact that they're all about the same slope suggests to me that this is a mix of noise and discretisation error… “
Surely Mister Rogers you are not back to disputing both Mr. Szamboti and the NIST regarding the proof that WTC7 sustained 8 storeys of freefall?