View Single Post
Old 1st December 2019, 01:56 PM   #964
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,467
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
No, you are too dense to get it. It is seen. By MIRO. As outlined in a paper 4.5 frigging years ago. To nobodies surprise. At 3.9 AU.

http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/2015/06...n-comets-coma/

Distribution of water around the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at 3.4 AU from the Sun as seen by the MIRO instrument on Rosetta
Biver, N. et al. (2015)
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ab...a26094-15.html
Quote:
Other evidence that there is some backflow of water from day- to nightside (even if not dominant close to the nucleus) is the clear detection of water emission (Figs. 2 and 6) beyond the nucleus on the nightside at levels that are often higher than against the nucleus
Interesting point, considering by now we are NOT talking about neutral molecules.

Backflow? Of charged matter? Interestingly the dust is also negatively charged and makes quite the show in the night sky.

So, jonesdave116, “water” and dust everywhere!!

But not enough ice to make comets mostly ice but enough dust to make comets mostly rock...
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top