The Electric Comet Theory /SAFIRE Part V
View Single Post
1st April 2020, 02:35 AM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Michael A'Hearn states that comet Tempel 1 is not rock ! We already knew that Sol88 was spewing out insane insults of the deceased Michael Francis A'Hearn and all astronomers by Sol88 linking them with Sol88's demented dogma, etc. and now Sol88 confirms his insanity!
No A'Hearn said 67P was MOSTLY ROCK, I think. Let me check...
At the simplest level, a very basic question is whether comets are mostly ice or mostly rock/dirt/refractory material. Whipple’s  model of the dirty snowball, the first quantitative model, envisioned cometary nuclei as mostly ice, although
our understanding has been evolving more toward mostly ROCK
, particularly for 67P/C-G for which refractory/volatile ratios as high
as 6 have been cited [3,4].
Michael F. A’Hearn
Nope, he did in fact write ROCK. Incompetent? when he really meant ICE? Even after clarifying it in the same paragraph?
Cant even quote properly, can you.
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.”
“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sol88