International Skeptics Forum - View Single Post

Trakar · 19th June 2010, 10:43 AM

http://dipastro.pd.astro.it/planets/...ctive_Ch10.pdf

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/...tml?page=1&c=y

http://www.is.wayne.edu/mnissani/a&s/GREENHOU.htm

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/nov_20...ions/crisp.pdf

Not that these, in themselves, are topic ending pieces, but if you are going to attack longstanding (close to two centuries old) mainstream scientific understandings, you would think that somewhere along the way, the actual science (preferrrable with a solid reference to the science, rather than a caricatured and distorted strawman version to beat up on) itself should be presented, if for no other reason than to clearly demonstrate how and where you think it to be incomplete or wrong.

19th June 2010, 10:43 AM	#9
Trakar Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 12,515	http://dipastro.pd.astro.it/planets/...ctive_Ch10.pdf http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/...tml?page=1&c=y http://www.is.wayne.edu/mnissani/a&s/GREENHOU.htm http://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/nov_20...ions/crisp.pdf Not that these, in themselves, are topic ending pieces, but if you are going to attack longstanding (close to two centuries old) mainstream scientific understandings, you would think that somewhere along the way, the actual science (preferrrable with a solid reference to the science, rather than a caricatured and distorted strawman version to beat up on) itself should be presented, if for no other reason than to clearly demonstrate how and where you think it to be incomplete or wrong.