View Single Post
Old 6th August 2006, 06:26 PM   #1
Cylinder
Philosopher
 
Cylinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 6,062
Reuters caught cloning smoke

Charles Johnson over at Little Green Footballs noticed something a bit odd in a Reuters' photograph this weekend:

Quote:
OK, now things are getting weird.

This Reuters photograph shows blatant evidence of manipulation. Notice the repeating patterns in the smoke; this is almost certainly caused by using the Photoshop “clone” tool to add more smoke to the image. (Hat tip: Mike.)

It’s so incredibly obvious, it reminds me of the faked CBS memos. Smoke simply does not contain repeating symmetrical patterns like this, and you can see the repetition in both plumes of smoke. There’s really no question about it.

But it’s not only the plumes of smoke that were “enhanced.” There are also cloned buildings.
The questioned image, taken by Lebanese freelance photographer Adnan Hajj, depicts a quite obviously cloned photo showing smoke rising from Israeli air-strikes on Beirut. Hajj is also credited with many of the photographs taken in the aftermath of the Qana air strike which killed 56 Lebanese.

Reuters drops freelance Lebanese photographer over image

Quote:
LONDON, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Reuters, the global news and information agency, told a freelance Lebanese photographer on Sunday it would not use any more of his pictures after he doctored an image of the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on Beirut.

The photograph by Adnan Hajj, which was published on news Web sites on Saturday, showed thick black smoke rising above buildings in the Lebanese capital after an Israeli air raid in the war with the Shi'ite Islamic group Hizbollah, now in its fourth week.

Reuters withdrew the doctored image on Sunday and replaced it with the unaltered photograph after several news blogs said it had been manipulated using Photoshop software to show more smoke.
The Jawa Report is pointing out some other questionable Hajj photos.

Quote:
The F-16 in the photo is not firing missiles, but is rather dropping chaffe or flares designed to be a decoy for surface-to-air missiles. However, a close up of what Hajj calls "missiles" reveals that only one flare has been dropped. The other two "flares" are simply copies of the original.
ETA: Sorry, this topis has already been covered here. Please see the original thread for discussion.
__________________
If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed ; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves. - Winston Churchill, The Gathering Storm

Last edited by Cylinder; 6th August 2006 at 06:39 PM.
Cylinder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top