Thread: [Continuation] Global warming discussion V
View Single Post
Old 21st January 2018, 05:56 PM   #9
Trakar
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trakar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,515
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
Originally Posted by Pixel42 View Post
https://www.theguardian.com/science/...ble-says-study

They've narrowed the range of estimates for climate sensitivity, eliminating both best and worst case scenarios.

Interesting but itís not going to change the generally accepted estimates of climate sensitivity. Itís actually fairly consistent with other estimates that donít factor in long term feedback effects. Itís generally only after you start factoring in long term feedback effects that you start to see estimates above 3.5 Deg C / doubling of CO2.
Yes, remember this study is still undergoing broader review within the field, passing publication peer review is only a publication issue, not a broad scientific adoption of the study's findings. This paper doesn't only not look at longer term effects and impacts (fat tail issues), it also does not attempt to include or analyze shorter term tipping point issues, and generally ignores Methane releases, permafrost melt, and the broader issues of adding more moisture to the atmosphere, deforestation, ocean acidification, etc., and how these all shape and change climate. Always good to more information, but I don't see that it changes much at all with regard to general mainstream understandings and projections, much less the dangers and problems already associated with climate change issues.
__________________
Trakar
"By doubting we come to inquiry, and through inquiry we perceive truth." ó Peter Abelard
"My civilization can do anything!" - David Brin (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i275AvgVvow)
Trakar is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top