View Single Post
Old 11th July 2019, 07:43 PM   #26
Norman Alexander
Norman Alexander's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,831
Originally Posted by zooterkin View Post
The judge thought he was jeopardising the case, yes. Whether he viewed that as enabling paedophiles is a different matter on which Iíd be surprised if he expressed a view.
The case was about pedophilia. Robinson's repeat actions, in blatant defiance of a legal ruling not to do so, could be reasonably construed as trying to support a potential pedophile in a court case by disrupting the legal process leading to a mistrial.

I rather doubt he would behave like this if he was violently opposed to pedophilia - he would have shut up and let the accused get convicted (assuming guilt, of course).

So the conclusion you can reasonably draw is that he supports the accused's position on pedophilia. That is, an enabler.
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornetsí nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top