View Single Post
Old 30th September 2018, 04:20 PM   #501
The Big Dog
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 29,742
Originally Posted by Cabbage View Post
Again, you are confusing the standards of a criminal trial (which takes away rights) with the standards of a supreme court nomination (which grants a privilege).

Proof beyond a shadow of a doubt is the standard that must be passed to remove rights. Much weaker evidence is all that's required to disallow the granting of a privilege.

Would you hire a person rumored to be a thief to manage your finances?

If you can't see the difference then I can't help you remove your partisan blinders.
Well, there is no corroborating evidence supporting Fordís story at all, which is why you are desperately trying to flip the burden onto BK. If you canít see that, I suggest you remove your partisan blinders.
The Big Dog is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top