International Skeptics Forum - View Single Post

drkitten · 25th October 2005, 07:00 AM

Originally Posted by Mojo

New announcement on the ACLUPA Blog: Judge Jones has struck out the Discovery Institute's amicus briefs on the grounds that they were an attempt to introduce Meyer and Dembski's evidence without their being cross-examined.

Minor correction. The DI introduced two briefs, one in its own name, and one in the name of the eight or so "scientists" whom the DI could scrape up to sign a statement supporting ID. Only the first brief was struck -- stricken -- strucken -- striked -- thrown out.

Still, it's not a good sign for the defendants....

25th October 2005, 07:00 AM	#173
drkitten Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 21,629	Originally Posted by Mojo New announcement on the ACLUPA Blog: Judge Jones has struck out the Discovery Institute's amicus briefs on the grounds that they were an attempt to introduce Meyer and Dembski's evidence without their being cross-examined. Minor correction. The DI introduced two briefs, one in its own name, and one in the name of the eight or so "scientists" whom the DI could scrape up to sign a statement supporting ID. Only the first brief was struck -- stricken -- strucken -- striked -- thrown out. Still, it's not a good sign for the defendants....