Originally Posted by
River
If the imprint were to be behind his head as "footers claimed" then it would be aligned differently with the prior imprint. (see green and yellow lines for reference) Not to mention the distance that would put the next imprint at would be more than double. (than the following imprint is on the footage showing the trackway) Not saying you're making that claim -- just making it clear.
Not to mention that the shadow they're pointing out is only about 14 inches from the print in the overhead shot, so it can't be the same thing that's more then 3 feet away in the Patterson shot.