View Single Post
Old 30th April 2012, 12:16 PM   #8408
Deacondark
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 334
Originally Posted by River View Post
If the imprint were to be behind his head as "footers claimed" then it would be aligned differently with the prior imprint. (see green and yellow lines for reference) Not to mention the distance that would put the next imprint at would be more than double. (than the following imprint is on the footage showing the trackway) Not saying you're making that claim -- just making it clear.

Not to mention that the shadow they're pointing out is only about 14 inches from the print in the overhead shot, so it can't be the same thing that's more then 3 feet away in the Patterson shot.
Deacondark is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top