Originally Posted by
AttorneyTom
Does it really matter ? It is all a bunch of silliness and yes.... the guy is a critical thinker or seems to be ?!
What do I know... I see your point but I am not sure that it is all that important or significant ?
Edit: I have not been here for many years but I just dont quite understand why we attack or get into a snit about other thoughts or observations that truly are not nut jobs ?
I'm not attacking anyone, nor am I "in a snit". I'm pointing out what I perceive to be a flaw in River's reasoning. It's significant, IMO, because River is proposing his discovery as positive proof that the PGF is a hoax.
I'm saying: "Wait a second, this object is missing in the overhead shot, and there is no sign of disturbed soil from any putative excavation."