HENRIBOY: As I predicted, you responded to my decade long challenge with your own brand of cognitive chaos. Again, you need to educate yourself in regards to the distinctions between opinion and fact. The saran and dark woolen fibers were not sourced to a cosmetic wig or clothing worn by Helena Stoeckley, so any proposed link has no forensic value. You also ignore the fact that none of the 29 DNA exemplars matched Stoeckley's DNA profile. You also ignore the fact that no head hairs found at the crime scene microscopically matched exemplars obtained from Stoeckley in 1971. You also ignore the fact that no finger, palm or footprints collected at the crime scene matched exemplars obtained from Stoeckley in 1971. Need I go on?