Originally Posted by
Crazy Chainsaw
OK, who is going to bury, this now dead study?
It is not likely to happen because discussion will continue.
Remember the taxonomic hierarchy:
(A) Subject area is 9/11 conspiracy
--- (B) Subset WTC Collapses
<< Explained as result of impact damage and unfought fires - no viable counter hypotheses
------(C)
subSubset claims for CD
<<Status No viable pro CD hypothesis to discuss
----------(D)
subsubSubset Claims for CD by explosive cutting
<< essentially disproved subject to use of Scientifically PC language
---------------(E) Alternate
subsubSubset Claims -Use of thermXte introduced
<< a complex of reasons << No viable hypothesis.
---------------------(F) at least three more levels of deeper descent into rabbit burrows. Including descent into tit for tat responses to persinal insults.
Summary:
(1) Discussion has been moot WRT to WTC 9/11 conspiracy since Level (C) since there is no pro CD hypothesis;
(2) No matter how far the "Truthers" or "Trolls" extend the rabbit burrows - some debunkers are willing to follow.