View Single Post
Old 11th July 2014, 11:09 PM   #102
hjhornbeck
Scholar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 74
Ah crap, I've gotta make a correction.

Originally Posted by hjhornbeck View Post
That reminds me: while Radford's blocking of search robots does help limit the spread of the info on his site, it also keeps those same robots from caching and archiving the thing. This has the convenient side-effect of allowing Radford to edit and memory-hole with impunity
Radford used to block web spiders from crawling his website, but sometime in the past he let them in. Here's the contents of his current robots.txt:

Quote:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /wp-admin/
Disallow: /wp-includes/
I'm not sure when the change occurred, but I know it must have happened sometime before April 21st, 2014 (http://web.archive.org/web/20140421225639/http://benrlegal.info/stollznows-falsified-documents-and-fraud/). That also means you can recover old versions; if you hurry, for instance, you can see copies of Radford's timeline and false accusation pages that predate the current edits (2014-05-30T15:42:36+00:00 and 2014-06-17T00:34:16+00:00, respectively).

As a consequence of the change, his legal website's been climbing the search engine charts. From my location, when I search for "Karen Stollznow," the website is hitting the top of Google's page 2, the bottom of page 3 on Bing.com, but the bottom of the first page on ask.com.

Looks like he's aiming at Stollznow's reputation, after all...
hjhornbeck is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top