View Single Post
Old 24th November 2015, 03:55 PM   #86
ozeco41
Philosopher
 
ozeco41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Moss Vale, NSW, Australia
Posts: 7,617
Originally Posted by gerrycan View Post
Originally Posted by jaydeehess View Post
Ok so AE911T will show its work. Its work though is limited to girder walk off. The least certain of all NIST's hypotheses. What happened to AE911T's contention that a single column failure cannot lead to global collapse or that the collapse seen cannot occur without explosives?
Says who? You have a vivid imagination.
It will be a big step forward if AE911 does go outside that false limitation.

To date that Szamboti imposed nonsense has limited debate of WTC7 initiation including the flow on AE911 initiatives such as those by Pepper.

Once they move outside of that false limit it means that they are abandoning most of Szamboti's nonsense.

It would be "One small step for 9/11 debate. One giant leap for AE911 kind."
ozeco41 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top