Originally Posted by
Jodie
I would agree if I had stated my idea was fact but I haven't. There has to be some speculation involved based on what is known. If you can't state what you are looking for in your research you won't get funding.
I posted a link showing how speculation ahead of the evidence is rarely, if ever, borne out by history. You respond by saying that it doesn't apply to your ideas because they're only speculation. You have repeatedly said that you expect the evidence to catch up one day with your speculation.
Were I to be unkind, I might surmise that you had either not read the article, or that you had but you had totally missed the point.
Would you care to correct this assumption?