Originally Posted by
Vixen
Here's the Peter Gill quote:
- From a review by N Ahmed
As for Vecchiotti, as I have pointed to her testimony under oath when she asked several times whether Stef's labs were contaminated was forced to concur they were not.
Citation please from the court documents that the laboratory was contaminated.
No court found any contamination in the lab.
LOL! You're citing an astrologer, claiming that as a peer review of Peter Gill's work. LOL!
For the umpteenth time - it is not up to a court to find contamination, or up to the defence to provide a route for contamination. As presented here countless times, a lab which does LCN work must be certified for it, which Stefanoni's lab was not.
When I asked for a forensic-DNA expert who would back Stefanoni's work, I wasn't asking for an astrologer's point of view.