View Single Post
Old 2nd August 2017, 01:12 PM   #187
Planigale
Philosopher
 
Planigale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 49 North
Posts: 6,753
Originally Posted by Vixen View Post
PAGE 76 - 77
Whether Gill said this or not is irrelevant as evidence has been posted that DNA transfer is detectable beyond 24 hours. Logically there is no reason for a time limit on transfer. If DNA is detectably present it is transferrable (by definition as it has to transfer from the site on to the swab to be detectable).

ETA let us consider transfer as proposed by Vixen
Transfer 1 DNA from Kercher on Knox
Transfer 2 (secondary) DNA of Kercher from Knox's hands on to basin (along with Knox's DNA a primary transfer).
Transfer 3 (tertiary) DNA of Kercher from the basin onto the swab (along with Knox's DNA a secondary transfer).

If we consider the Luminol positive prints that were DNA positive.

Transfer 1 Kercher's DNA onto floor.
Transfer 2 Kerchers DNA from floor onto Knox's feet
Transfer 3 Kercher's DNA from from Knox's feet to floor
Transfer 4 Kercher's DNA from floor (some six weeks after the murder) to swab.

Now if we are to believe Vixen a quaternary transfer of DNA six weeks later is impossible so we can only conclude that the forensic police must have made up the results.

Last edited by Planigale; 2nd August 2017 at 01:22 PM.
Planigale is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top