View Single Post
Old 13th March 2017, 11:03 AM   #285
CORed
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central City, Colorado, USA
Posts: 10,589
Originally Posted by Cervelo View Post
Your making the same ridicules claim the Nawckies and many other footers make. Multiple and routine contact with a giant monkey man almost every time you go "researching". Yet you can't or won't bother to produce any verifiable evidence, your beyond that, you just want to see one....okey-dokey
I'd have bad news for you, but you already know this, it's not going to happen.
Why?....your running a for hire "Bigfoot experience". I would suggest it's quite apparent what your doing, just not sure what you get out of it....gold n glory?
The funny thing is, that the more footers claim the ubiquity of bigfoot, the more absurd the claim gets. Back in the '60's after the Patterson-Gimlin film came out, bigfoot was supposed to be a rare creature that was teetering on the brink of extinction in wild areas of the Pacific Northwest. It was just barely plausible that such a creature had escaped detection. Now footers would have you believe that every five acre patch of second or third growth woodland in the midwest has a family of bigfoots in it. Add in the fact that damn near everyone now carries with them a pretty good still and video camera in their smartphone, and the absence of either good quality phoots and videos or of any physical evidence makes that claim absurd.

Last edited by CORed; 13th March 2017 at 12:02 PM.
CORed is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top