Originally Posted by
Cervelo
Your making the same ridicules claim the Nawckies and many other footers make. Multiple and routine contact with a giant monkey man almost every time you go "researching". Yet you can't or won't bother to produce any verifiable evidence, your beyond that, you just want to see one....okey-dokey
I'd have bad news for you, but you already know this, it's not going to happen.
Why?....your running a for hire "Bigfoot experience". I would suggest it's quite apparent what your doing, just not sure what you get out of it....gold n glory?
The funny thing is, that the more footers claim the ubiquity of bigfoot, the more absurd the claim gets. Back in the '60's after the Patterson-Gimlin film came out, bigfoot was supposed to be a rare creature that was teetering on the brink of extinction in wild areas of the Pacific Northwest. It was just barely plausible that such a creature had escaped detection. Now footers would have you believe that every five acre patch of second or third growth woodland in the midwest has a family of bigfoots in it. Add in the fact that damn near everyone now carries with them a pretty good still and video camera in their smartphone, and the absence of either good quality phoots and videos or of any physical evidence makes that claim absurd.