View Single Post
Old 3rd December 2019, 01:29 AM   #988
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,433
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
Sorry? The only joke is you sidestepping the obvious failure of your unscientific woo. They detect water. Fact. That kills your woo.



Nope. You made false claims about that. They excavated thousands of tonnes of ice at Tempel 1. Fact. That killed your woo. 14 years ago.
And Tusenfem has never been involved in a paper that has anything to do directly with estimating the quantity of ice. Only the plasma processes (which are beyond your comprehension) caused by the outgassing that comes from the various ices.



No they aren't.



What does he say? Read the paper, have you? I'd be amazed if you had. What is his estimation of the mass loss due to gas (on which he is most likely wrong)? How does it tie in with your idiotic, impossible woo? Need a clue? I've quoted it before. How many hundreds of thousands of tonnes does he suggest? I am not expecting an answer, as it would involve you suddenly acquiring maths and comprehension skills that you quite clearly do not possess.



No, it doesn't. What Patzold has likely messed up, is his estimation of the mass that is returned to the comet from the outgassing. As suggested by other authors. Even so, there is still waaaaay too much ice for you to explain. And you cannot and have not even tried to explain it. You have no model.



Wrong. And nobody is saying that there weren't hundreds of thousands of tonnes of ice. Only you, and you don't count, due to having clue zero about any of the relevant science or maths. And nobody has claimed that comets are mostly ice for decades. That is just something that you keep lying about. Due to being a liar.
Sound like you don't know how they guesstimate ices!

Patzold, is on the money. His real problem is it makes everyone else look like beginners.

The outgasses a piddley little amount of water released from the hydrated minerals! Same as on Asteroids champ!
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top