View Single Post
Old 8th October 2019, 08:47 AM   #202
Meadmaker
Penultimate Amazing
 
Meadmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,677
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
The way I see it, there's a list of reasons for a President to do Hypothetical X. As long as any of the reasons on that list are legitimately within the responsibility of the President, it is almost impossible to make a legal case that he should be tried for Corrupt Reason Y. Absent an explicit confession to Reason Y, I don't really see how it could be done.
Seems fairly straightforward.
Meadmaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top