Originally Posted by Sol88
Is just more lies about what A'Hearn said and meant. Pathetic. It doesn't matter a damn what the ratio of dust to ice is on one comet. We know that there is ice, and we know that there is gas from that ice. And we know that there is sufficient to stop the solar wind thousands of kilometres from the nucleus, and to form a diamagnetic cavity. None of those things are explainable by your failed woo. Mainly due to you not knowing of their existence when you set off on this defence of your Velikovskian non-science. Just as it wasn't known to the clowns who invented it.