View Single Post
Old 2nd December 2015, 02:05 AM   #316
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
 
Crazy Chainsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,895
Originally Posted by ozeco41 View Post
It is not likely to happen because discussion will continue.

Remember the taxonomic hierarchy:

(A) Subject area is 9/11 conspiracy
--- (B) Subset WTC Collapses << Explained as result of impact damage and unfought fires - no viable counter hypotheses
------(C) subSubset claims for CD <<Status No viable pro CD hypothesis to discuss
----------(D) subsubSubset Claims for CD by explosive cutting << essentially disproved subject to use of Scientifically PC language
---------------(E) Alternate subsubSubset Claims -Use of thermXte introduced << a complex of reasons << No viable hypothesis.
---------------------(F) at least three more levels of deeper descent into rabbit burrows. Including descent into tit for tat responses to persinal insults.

Summary:
(1) Discussion has been moot WRT to WTC 9/11 conspiracy since Level (C) since there is no pro CD hypothesis;

(2) No matter how far the "Truthers" or "Trolls" extend the rabbit burrows - some debunkers are willing to follow.
Agreed, I am though solely looking at this from the point of scientific curiosity, to understand
The chemistry of the fires and rubble pile better.
I now know that simple reduction of the oxide in paint chips with carbon, or SUfur can
Create exothermic chips, that will combust in air but not under inert atmosphere.
What is more interesting though is they provide the natural ignition source for Aluminothermic reactions. Natural forms of thermite, and could have been generated easily in the hydrocarbon fires, in the buildings or in the rubble pile.
Crazy Chainsaw is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top