View Single Post
Old 1st January 2018, 02:27 PM   #167
caveman1917
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 8,143
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
I know the answer to this.
And I didn't ask that.

Quote:
If you keep changing the meaning of what is being debated, you can keep your options open by redefining the debate... that way, you can avoid ever being pinned down to a position.
My position is simple: asserting any ontology is worse than asserting no ontology, essentially by Occam's razor. And that materialism is, indeed, a fad.
caveman1917 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top