Originally Posted by
smartcooky
I know the answer to this.
And I didn't ask that.
Quote:
If you keep changing the meaning of what is being debated, you can keep your options open by redefining the debate... that way, you can avoid ever being pinned down to a position.
My position is simple: asserting
any ontology is worse than asserting no ontology, essentially by Occam's razor. And that materialism is, indeed, a fad.