Originally Posted by
caveman1917
No you can't. Suppose we let go off an object (L) and observe it to fall down (F) then some data we could have would be: LFLFLFLF. We get a law of gravity: L -> LF and can compress the data to:
"L -> LF, LLLL"
Yes. For me, this is actualism.
I see the object fall
I understand why it falls.
This is all that is relevant.
Originally Posted by
caveman1917
So far for the science. Now any ontology you're going to assert here is going to make this compressed data larger, such as:
"L -> LF, LLLL, and L is a really real thing" (ie materialism)
but also
"L -> LF, LLLL, and L is a simulated thing" (ie matrixism)
or
"L -> LF, LLLL, and L is a product of my mind" (ie solipsism)
and so on
This is philosobabble, and I cannot even begin to parse it, let alone understand how any of it has relevance to actualism.