View Single Post
Old 9th July 2017, 09:23 AM   #403
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,725
Originally Posted by Craig B View Post
Slavery is a social status, and the existence of slavery is about wealth )as well as relattive social status). Slaves were possessions, and were included in the inventory of wealth enumerated by their owners.

They also contributed to wealth by working without remuneration beyond their keep, and being unable to change their employers in search of better conditions of life. They could be sold, in the United States, because they were legally chattels.

The attempt to distinguish between wealth on one hand and slavery on the other is a distress signal, indicating intellectual desperation on the part of anyone ill-advised enough to embark on such a preposterous argument.
I don't know what you mean by distinguishing between wealth and slavery. However, I am parsing their motives.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top