View Single Post
Old 22nd November 2010, 04:24 AM   #281
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
Well, to be fair to Mr Gauci, perhaps memory becomes a little less confident, showing now to be somewhat vague and circumspect when the small matter of $3m is at stake. That is an improvement, given his initial recollection does not support the prosecutions assertion whatsoever. And as Vincent Vassallo testified, DCI Bell seems to certainly have had a penchant for financial inducement as a procedure for the witnesses memory to "improve" over the years from 1989 to 2000.

Last edited by Buncrana; 22nd November 2010 at 04:26 AM.
Buncrana is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top