Originally Posted by
ChristianProgressive
And the hacking of voter registration databases? The fake/doctored emails? The fact our voting machines are not secure and demonstrably have not been since the mid 2000s? The statistical analyses that show anomalies in pro-Clinton precincts and counties?
There is more than enough evidence to invalidate this so-called election, if not outright declare Clinton the rightful winner.
I have issues with three of those but I just want to focus on one?
Where does it say you can't have a fair election because a private entity presents doctored documents?