View Single Post
Old 13th August 2008, 10:57 AM   #11
RPG Advocate
Critical Thinker
RPG Advocate's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 281
We need a place where the CAM practitioners themselves write articles and create a true picture of its history, development, efficacy and positive research.
There isn't any problem with this wiki as far as I can tell. Regarding efficacy, all their articles will say something along the lines of "In double-blind, randomized trials, [treatment] performed no better than placebo". All the positive research will show that CAM only "works" in conjunction with evidence-based treatments. As such, this whole project will actually show that evidence-based medicine is the way to go.
RPG Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top