View Single Post
Old 8th April 2009, 12:03 PM   #940
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,122
Originally Posted by roundhead View Post
I suggest you write a peer reviewed rebuttal to this paper, something nobody on earth has done even with the "14 points" paper.

Until then, this verbal jabbering is simply that, an excercise in gill plate flapping that has zero scientific merit.
Jones debunks himself; if only you could read and understand the paper.

Quote:
Prior to soaking the chip in MEK an XEDS spectrum was acquired from an area of the red-layer surface. The resulting spectrum, shown in Fig. (14), produced the expected peaks for Fe, Si, Al, O, and C. Other peaks included calcium, sulfur, zinc, chromium and potassium. The occurrence of these elements could be attributed to surface contamination due to the fact that the analysis was performed on the as-collected surface of the red layer. The large Ca and S peaks may be due to contamination with gypsum from the pulverized wallboard material in the buildings.
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top