View Single Post
Old 12th October 2017, 11:57 AM   #1814
Tomtomkent
Philosopher
 
Tomtomkent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,607
Originally Posted by MicahJava View Post
Do you have a reason for thinking a bullet could not have entered near the EOP and traveled below the cerebellum?
1) The only bullet hole in the skull is the one you call the "Cowlick"
2) There is no way of the bullet entering where you say without the trauma damaging the cerebellum.
3) The damage to the base of the skull is not compatible with this.
4) There is no evidence of damage to the neck or spine, compatible with this.
5) The "Cowlick" is a complete wound, not only an entry, but a trauma path and exit.
6) No pathologist engaged in the autopsy, or official reviews, went on record to describe the wound you imagine to be proving.
7) It is clearly utter rubbish.
__________________
@tomhodden

Never look up an E-book because this signature line told you. Especially not Dead Lament (ASIN: B00JEN1MWY). Or A Little Trouble (ASIN: B00GQFZZQW).
Tomtomkent is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top