View Single Post
Old 12th October 2017, 09:41 PM   #1839
HSienzant
Philosopher
 
HSienzant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Never Mind
Posts: 5,074
Originally Posted by MicahJava View Post
I knew you had trouble reading. It's a 1 out of 60 chance if you load the already-empty shell casings and eject them.
How does the ejector mechanism know whether a bullet was fired from that shell when you work the bolt and eject the empty cartridge? How does it know it was empty when loaded?

Show us how it makes it difference to how the ejector mechanism works.

Walk us through that, with diagrams.

If you can't, the fact that you're claiming empty shells get the dent at a 1 in 60 ratio shows you're admitting empty shells can be damaged as the shell in evidence (CE543).

You just don't understand what you're arguing.

Hank
__________________
I have never ”refused” to provide evidence. I provide evidence if requested to do so in a specific and relevant manner.

Hanks ”method” [of requesting evidence] is not going to [get me to] provide any evidence since it has a completely different purpose. To create the the illusion of me not providing evidence when requested to do so.
- Manifesto

Last edited by HSienzant; 12th October 2017 at 10:07 PM.
HSienzant is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top