View Single Post
Old 15th March 2017, 08:32 PM   #1653
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Where the Arrantly Roam
Posts: 26,169
Originally Posted by Emily's Cat View Post
You've supported the use of preemptive violence against people that you've decided are fascists. Not based on what they've done, but on what they've said. You have supported and lauded aggression and assault as an appropriate response to speech in order to stop "those people" from engaging in "that sort of" speech.
Again with 'preemptive', strawmanning the argument. And pretending that I decided anyone to be anything.

Quote:
What do you think your stance is? Please clarify.
Sure. After you support the 'preemptive' claim you make. It adds on a very different element, so I'm not inclined to let it slide.

Quote:
ETA: I'm basing my responses on these posts of yours:

All of these boil down to "Attacking people is wrong, unless you're attacking a 'fascist', then it's ok".
Only if you are predisposed to a conclusion. There are others you could reach with the same quotes, should you read without bias.
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top