Originally Posted by
ozziemate
oops I am claiming only that the proof of the existance of the photon is ambiguous leaving room for better explanations for the effects that do not reqwuire a travelling photon to achieve the same effects.
Can you list any phenomena that are not explained by the current model?
Can you suggest a new model that explains them, and also explains everything that the current model does?
Then you have a "better explanation".
And also a Nobel Prize.